Skip to content

TINYDOC-3531 - Document expand and split format parameters for content formatting#4260

Open
kemister85 wants to merge 1 commit into
tinymce/8from
hotfix/8/TINYDOC-3531
Open

TINYDOC-3531 - Document expand and split format parameters for content formatting#4260
kemister85 wants to merge 1 commit into
tinymce/8from
hotfix/8/TINYDOC-3531

Conversation

@kemister85

@kemister85 kemister85 commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ticket: TINYDOC-3531

Site: Staging branch

Changes:

  • Documented the expand format parameter in modules/ROOT/partials/configuration/formats.adoc (Format parameters section): description, type, default (true for selector formats), possible values, and an example. expand controls whether the range is expanded to cover the whole matching selector element before a format is applied or removed; expand: false restricts the operation to the current selection.
  • Documented the split format parameter: description, type, default (true for inline/non-selector formats, false for selector/block formats), possible values, and an example. split controls whether the wrapping element is split at the selection boundaries when a format is removed.
  • Both parameters were already used in the existing block_expand, deep, and removeformat examples on this page but were undefined; they are now listed alongside the other format object properties.
  • Fixed a pre-existing malformed AsciiDoc marker in the adjacent block_expand entry (+Default value:* -> *Default value:*) so its default value renders in bold like every other parameter.

All parameter descriptions and defaults were validated against the TinyMCE core formatter source.


Pre-checks:

  • Branch is correctly prefixed: hotfix/8/TINYDOC-3531

  • Files have been included where required (partial included by content-formatting.adoc).

  • Build passes without console errors, warnings, or issues.


Review:

  • Documentation Team Lead has reviewed.

@kemister85 kemister85 requested review from a team and soritaheng as code owners July 7, 2026 06:27
@kemister85 kemister85 requested review from ArvinJ-H, MitchC1999, ShiridiGandham and tiny-ben-tran and removed request for MitchC1999 and tiny-ben-tran July 7, 2026 06:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant